blog academic download about   picture
home
 

Bogus intelligent design

I attended a talk by a “science communicator” who was visiting my University. He was speaking on intelligent design from a neutral (yeah, right) perspective.

He outlined both the evolution and intelligent design theories. He quoted anti-evolution argument of the molecular motors that some bacteria use to propel themselves. These little spinning corkscrews propellers consist of over 30 different proteins. Anti-evolutionist have long argued that it would be impossible for these 30 proteins to come together in just the right configuration all at once in one evolutionary step, yet they would have had to in order to form a working and useful motor. However, apparently scientists have now discovered a bacteria that does a similar thing with just 6 proteins. Ha! (although how or why they got from 6 to 30 is not yet known)

He also gave the famous example of the eye, which is way too complicated to have “evolved”. However, scientists have now discovered “light sensitive skin”. Creatures with such skin obviously gradually evolved into animals with modern eyes. Ha! (although the exact details of how this happened are not yet known)

Another common misconception is that evolution happens by “chance”. It is not at all chance. There is no planned outcome. it is not like drawing a specific pair of card from a deck of cards (which would have a small probability). Much rather, it is like getting any pair of matching cards from a deck (much more likely). Lots of different evolutionary paths will work. Nature just happens to have evolved the way it has. If the Universe’s dice had rolled differently then we’d all be completely different. So, the ridiculously low probabilities quoted by some opponents of evolution are inaccurate. They are actually much smaller (but still pretty unlikely).

The final steak in the heart of intelligent design is the motivation of intelligent design advocates. Leaked internal documents reveal that they are all Christians who are trying to use it as an inroad to have their religion taught in public schools. This is against the American constitutions, so it is no wonder that the “evolution is just a theory” stickers on text-books and other such attempts get struck down by the courts. The judges aren’t stupid. They know there is an ulterior motive behind it.

Christians are being trained up in special universities like the elite Patrick Henry College and the Opus Dei society. They are then tasked with infiltrating key positions of power in school boards, etc. to push their (unconstitutional) Christian agendas.

After his “neutral” talk I asked him about Michael Cremo’s books. His answer (and I paraphrase):

Oh yeah, he is another one of those religious types. Which organization does he belong to? The Hare Krishnas, right? However, he does come up with a few very uncomfortable facts. So, yes, I recommend everyone at least has a browse through one of his books. But, don’t read any of them, because they are - like - “this” thick. But keep an open mind and at least look at some of the controversial archeological findings he presents.

So, in summary (according to this science communicator person), intelligent design is a concocted idea that ultimately aims to have Christian creationism taught in schools. Science (the new God) will very soon discover the exact detailed mechanism of evolution (even if a few minor missing links are still missing at the moment). And the world will continue to ignore the extremely detailed (non-Christan) intelligent design theory offered by the Vedic literature (even if it does make perfect sense and answer many of the open questions).

3 Responses to “Bogus intelligent design”

  1. david Says:

    Did you record this exchange? It would be interesting to hear.
    I am always fasinated that those who put forward that evalution is correct miss the fact that its founder was also unclear and later on stated that he still felt that their was a creator and wasn’t he also fundementally christian?; this is well documented but often over looked.
    A theory remains a theory untill it can be proven and as science can still not answer even the fundimental questions then it can be descounted; or so the theory goes.

  2. Hugo Bains Says:

    You say vedic lit offers detailed theories that answer the open questions. Can you provide one or two examples of this to backup your claim?

  3. candidas das Says:

    Example: the Vedas describe periodic minor devastations once every catur yuga (4 million years) and major devastations every day of Brahma (4 billion years). And indeed, these devastations match the times for past ice ages and the big-bang respectively. We should expect to find evidence of intelligent life right up until these dates, and that is what the archeological record does indeed show.

    Much more information in “Human Devolution” by Michael Cremo.

    Reviews here and here.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

 
 
 
 

deltaflow is humbly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS), Comments (RSS) and Podcast (RSS).